Annual Report: Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences: August 1 2001 – June 30 2002[1]
PI: George H. Fisher
AFOSR Grant F49620-01-1-0360
Notable accomplishments of our MURI award over the past year include these major developments:
This annual report is organized as follows: We first provide a brief exposition of several of the major accomplishments identified above, followed by 4 detailed, chronological quarterly reports that were provided by all 9 University Teams over the course of the year. Finally, at the end of the report, we provide a list of publications funded in part or in full by the Solar MURI project.
Efforts like the MURIs are important in that they provide a rare opportunity to get new talent into targeted fields, such as the solar origins of Space Weather. The Solar MURI grant has resulted in these new hires:
Brian Welsch, a recent PhD graduate of the Physics Department at Montana State University, was hired as a new postdoc at UC Berkeley to work on scientific topics related to Solar MURI. He is also collaborating closely with Spiro Antiochos, Rick Devore, and Mark Linton at the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington DC, and spends significant time each year at NRL. Brian is pursuing a project aimed at understanding whether shearing and reconnection of a simple bipolar active region can lead to an erupting flux-rope configuration. This project is an outgrowth of the “Numerical Experiments” MURI workshop that was held at UNH earlier this year (and described further below).
Andrew Phillips is a new postdoc at Drexel University working for Peter MacNeice. He began work in mid February, after finishing a PhD degree in the UK. He has been developing a Sedov test of the hydrodynamics of a High Order Godunov code using the Paramesh adaptive mesh refinement algorithm.
Jimin Gao is a graduate student interested in computational physics that is working with MacNeice on the Solar MURI project.
Stephane Regnier is a new postdoc at Montana State University, working with Dick Canfield and Dana Longcope. He received his PhD recently in France, and is now working with Canfield & Longcope on the reduction of vector magnetograms, the development of coronal force-free-field models based on the magnetogram data, and comparison of the theoretical models with solar coronal observations. He is playing a key role in the use of observed data in NOAA region 8210 to drive MHD simulations of magnetic eruptions.
Yong-Jae Moon is a new postdoc at BBSO/NJIT. He has expertise in the analysis of data from solar flares and CMEs, and the use of vector magnetograph data. He has been an especially prolific contributor to MURI funded publications over the past year.
Adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) is essential if one wishes to simultaneously resolve small scale structures on the Sun and large scale structures in the outer corona and the heliosphere. Therefore one of the goals we set for ourselves at the beginning of the Solar MURI project was to use the expertise of Peter MacNeice, one of the originators of the Paramesh AMR and domain decomposition software, to help integrate Paramesh into our already existent numerical MHD codes, Zeus-3D (corona) and ENLIL (heliosphere). This process was begun during a 1 week mini-workshop at GSFC during July of 2001, attended by Odstrcil, Abbett, Ledvina, & MacNeice, and was successfully completed this year. In addition to the inclusion of Paramesh, Abbett & Ledvina incorporated other improvements into Zeus-3D, such as the elimination of operator splitting in the transport step (an improvement originally implemented by Yuhong Fan of HAO), which improved the code’s efficiency and accuracy. Abbett & Ledvina have dubbed their new version of ZEUS ``ZeusAMR”.
Abbett also worked to include
a much more physically consistent coupling between our interior MHD code,
ANMHD, which is used for simulations of the solar interior, and Zeus-3D and
ZeusAMR. An example of the computed
evolution of the emergence of an active region, performed with ANMHD and
Zeus-3D is shown in Figures 1. The left
hand side of Figure 1 shows how the 2 codes are coupled together in space,
while the right hand side shows a comparison between the MHD solution and a
potential field solution with increasing time for an emerging, twisted active
region flux with different levels of twist within each tube.
Figure 1 – Bottom red box on left shows the volume encompassed by the ANMHD simulation of an emerging, twisted active region flux tube rising though the solar interior toward the solar surface. The grey plane and the field lines above it show the Zeus-3D simulation of the response of the solar corona to the emerging flux. The 6 images on the right hand side show comparisons between the MHD simulations of coronal evolution and a potential field extrapolation. The left hand column shows the MHD results, and the right hand column the potential field extrapolation. Each row shows a different amount of twist in the emerging active region flux tube, with the top row corresponding to no initial twist, and the bottom row to substantial twist. These results are presented in a paper by Abbett & Fisher to be published in ApJ on January 1 2003.
Improvements to the ANMHD code were made as a collaboration between team member Abbett and Yuhong Fan of HAO, while they were both participants in the “Origins of Solar Magnetism” program at the Institute for Theoretical Physics at UCSB. The ANMHD source code is publicly available on our Solar MURI website as the file Anmhd.tar.gz in the directory http://solarmuri.ssl.berkeley.edu/~abbett/public/software/ .
An illustration of a similar
calculation performed with ZeusAMR, exhibiting the use of a block adaptive
mesh, is shown in Figure 2. 
Figure 2 – Emerging flux simulation showing field lines (white) and vertical velocity contours in a single vertical plane (blue). Mesh size is shown as the checkerboard patterns. The adaptive mesh allows for a large dynamic range in size scales.
Simulations such as these can
also be incorporated in a fairly straightforward way into simple source surface
models of the large-scale corona.
Figure 3 shows how one of Abbett’s emerging active regions affects an
initially dipolar magnetic field on the Sun and how the active region changes
the location of the coronal hole boundaries.
Figure 3 – illustration of how an emerging active region simulation can be used to study its effects on an initially simple dipolar solar magnetic field. Note the distortion of the northward coronal hole toward the active region. A similar configuration resulted in the famous “elephant trunk” coronal hole in 1996 when a large active region formed at low latitudes near solar minimum.
During a 1 week visit by Dusan Odstrcil to Berkeley in August of 2002, Ledvina & Odstrcil settled on a code-coupling framework for connecting ZeusAMR simulations of the outer corona with ENLIL simulations of the heliosphere. To facilitate this coupling, a spherical version of ZeusAMR is being developed and tested.
It was clear early on that many of the problems that must be solved to achieve a solar and heliospheric numerical modeling system are too complex to be tackled by individual researchers working alone. We therefore decided to organize a series of focused workshops to tackle what we regarded as the most pressing problems in modeling the solar origins of space weather. At this point, we have held 4 of these workshops, and plan to hold 2 more: UH team members are hosting a workshop in Honolulu Nov. 18-20 on the use of the new coronal IR / magnetic field measurements to be made on Haleakala, and how to make best use of this new data in our theoretical and numerical modeling efforts. Jozsef Kota, Janet Luhmann, and Marty Lee are organizing one on SEP acceleration to be held at the University of Arizona March 17-18 of 2003.
The first of the workshops held this past year was on the
Paramesh adaptive mesh and domain decomposition tool, which has now been
successfully incorporated in both ZeusAMR and ENLIL. It was the success of that workshop that led us to organize 3
more – one on the construction of synoptic magnetic maps, one on the use of
vector magnetograms to drive numerical models of the corona, and a workshop on
numerical experiments for CME initiation.
This one-day workshop was held in Boulder, CO just before Space Weather Week. The workshop was organized by team member Bernie Jackson, and was attended by scientists from both MURI teams, as well as participants from SEC/NOAA.
Synoptic maps of the
photospheric field distribution remain the sole quantitative observational
input for coronal and solar wind models and thus are key to the success of
Sun-Earth modeling efforts.
Although digital
synoptic maps of the photospheric field distribution are now routinely
available from a number of solar observatories (e.g., Mount Wilson, Wilcox, and
National (on Kitt Peak), the methods and processing used to construct them
differ considerably, as do their archive file formats, spatial resolutions, and
physical data units. This general lack of uniformity makes it very tedious and
cumbersome for users to switch back and forth between synoptic maps generated
by different facilities (data gaps being a prime example as to why such a switch
might be necessary).
As more groups coordinate their research efforts by studying specific events and as more models are run in a (near) real-time mode, the ability to use uniformly assembled synoptic maps from multiple observatories is becoming increasingly critical. The solar and heliospheric communities would benefit from a reliable, centrally located public site providing synoptic maps (from multiple observatories) which have a uniform file format and which have been constructed using an established and documented assembly technique.
Over the last few
years, through support from ONR, NSF, and NASA, a generalized synoptic map
assembly code has been developed by Nick Arge at NOAA/SEC. This code can merge
line-of-sight magnetograms from virtually any solar observatory into daily
updated and full Carrington synoptic maps, as well as other types. It is
versatile in that it provides greater control over how the maps are constructed
and as to what corrections (unique to each observatory) need to be applied to
the magnetic field data. It is thus ideally suited to provide the solar
community with a standardized set of synoptic maps. In addition, the model is
housed at a facility (NOAA/SEC) that is both reliable and readily accessible to
the public. The ready availability of regularly updated, uniformly constructed
synoptic maps from several observational sources will significantly facilitate
the development of Sun-Earth propagation modeling capabilities.
Vector Magnetogram Workshop (April 29-May 1 2002)
The workshop was held at SSL/UC Berkeley, and was organized by Dick Canfield and George Fisher. It was attended by MURI team members, and by other experts on vector magnetogram data (Tom Metcalf [LMSAL] and KD Leka [CoRA], as well as Zoran Mikic [SAIC]). Here is the resulting “plan of action”:
Phase I
.

Figure 4 – vertical magnetic field map of AR 8210 with all magnetic flux concentrations labeled (courtesy Dana Longcope).
Phase II. Carry out MHD simulations
1.
Do Zeus AMR
simulations using real magnetic field data near time of CME using synoptic
magnetic field solutions as boundary condition. (Berkeley team members)
2.
Couple coronal
and interplanetary codes (Abbett, Ledvina, Odstrcil)
Phase III. Validation of modelling using available
solar and IP data (team)
Numerical
experiments to understand CME initiation:
(Workshop held
May 14-16 at UNH in Durham)
This workshop was
organized by Terry Forbes, and was attended by many members of both the Michigan
and Berkeley MURI teams, as well as scientists from AFRL and NRL.
The objective of the
workshop was to define the most urgent numerical MHD simulations needed to
understand the physics of magnetic field eruption on the Sun (ie CME
initiation). What emerged were 3
different classes of investigation that the participants felt were
necessary. These are outlined below in
a very skeletal form.
o 3-d Emerged Bipole: Form a flux-rope in a simulated corona by converging footpoints of coronal fields (analogous to “flux cancellation” seen near neutral lines in filament channels)
o
the
computational domain is 3-d non-periodic box with high b =
10?) on bottom boundary, with stratification such that b << 1
within lower part of simulation volume.
o
initial
condition (IC) has volume-filling dipole field.
o
impose
incompressible converging flows on bottom boundary (if initial configuration is
slightly twisted) or converging flows with shear (if initial configuration is
untwisted).
o Flux rope in coronal volume is formed via the emergence of a pre-existing twisted flux tube from a region of high b to low b
o Initial conditions: buoyantly unstable horizontal twisted flux tube immersed in high-b plasma at base of gravitationally stratified 3-d box.
o Follow rise of twisted flux tube from deep in convection zone through photosphere into corona. Critical issue: initial position of tube cannot be too near surface, as flux tube curvature matters.
o Unspecified parameter: degree of twist in emerging tube. Twist too high perhaps prevents mass drainage, hampering emergence; twist too low does not give true flux rope in corona.
o Unspecified parameter: Magnetic field configuration in corona prior to flux rope emergence. Initial runs w/field-free corona envisioned.
o As above, primary goal is to get flux rope in
corona; subsequent efforts to attain eruption envisioned after attainment of
primary.
o As above, some modification of existing codes necessary.
III. Emergence Within a
Multi-Polar Configuration
Emerge one flux tube into into a background magnetic field; the sheared arcade/flux rope formation is by reconnection between emerging flux and pre-existing flux.
§
Initial
conditions: buoyantly unstable flux tube immersed in high-b plasma at base of gravitationally stratified
3-d box with background magnetic field configuration composed of a pre-emerged
flux tube and large scale “restraining field”, and form sheared arcade/flux
rope by reconnection between the two flux tubes. The critical issue: without restraining field, reconnected flux
expected to rise to top of computational volume in non-explosive manner.
§
Primary goal is
attainment of sheared arcade/flux rope in corona; subsequent effort to attain
eruption envisioned.
§
In one effort
to attain eruption, additional polarity will be added to restraining field to
make it quadrupolar.
Unspecified parameter: twist in either pre-emerged or newly-emerging flux ropes. Presence of twist might either enhance or diminish storage of energy in the field, and hence likelihood of eruption.
The full specification of all the necessary magnetic elements for this class of simulations is illustrated with the simple diagram below:

Figure 5 – an illustration of the full multi-polar configuration for the 3rd class of numerical experiments. Initially, only the interaction between the two central bipoles (one pre-existing, the other emerging) will be considered. The magnetic neutral line between them is shown as the dashed curve. An additional overlying, constraining bipole field will then be considered; finally, a very large-scale bipole with the opposite polarity will be added. The last bipole can be considered as a schematic representation of the overall solar dipole field. This last level of complexity is necessary to create magnetic null points in the corona and hence achieve a “breakout” topology.
Deriving Self-Consistent Velocities from Sequential Vector Magnetograms
One of the major technical obstacles identified at the vector magnetogram workshop was determining the physically self-consistent vector velocity field at the surface where vector magnetic fields are measured. Dana Longcope (MSU) has achieved a major breakthrough on this problem, and has created a mathematical framework to describe the problem and has proposed a solution, and written an “alpha” version of an IDL procedure to implement the solution. The details of Dana’s formalism can be found on the Solar MURI website at http://solarmuri.ssl.berkeley.edu/~dana/public/presentations/ as SHINE02.ps . Current versions of the IDL software can be found in the “team” part of the website as http://solarmuri.ssl.berkeley.edu/~dana/team/software/ . Shown below is a comparison of the velocity field from a real MHD simulation of flux emergence, and that derived using Dana’s inversion technique.
|
|
||||
Figure 6 – Comparison between velocity field from an MHD simulation (left) and the reconstructed velocity field using Longcope’s inversion technique (right)
OVERVIEW
OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR PAST 2 MONTHS
Major
progress was made in numerical modeling capabilities over the past 2 months,
with both the solar coronal (ZeusAMR) and heliospheric MHD codes (ENLIL) being
upgraded to include adaptive mesh refinement.
These efforts are not complete, but the codes are running and are
currently being debugged and tested.
Observational
efforts continued at BBSO, UH, MSU, and UCB, with Yan Li and Dick Canfield
continuing their efforts to construct a database of well-observed CMEs for in
depth studies, and BBSO conducting a coordinated flare campaign.
Instrument
construction, repair, and upgrades continue at BBSO and UH.
New papers
were reported by Jing et al. (UH), Wang et al. (BBSO).
The Solar
MURI website and data sharing server was set up and is now operational; the URL
is http://solarmuri.ssl.berkeley.edu
. All Solar MURI team members should have received email about how to use the
data sharing aspects of the website, as well as how to log in and what the
passwords are. If a login account for
new MURI team members is necessary, please contact George Fisher
(fisher@ssl.berkeley.edu) or Bill Abbett (abbett@ssl.berkeley.edu).
Detailed
descriptions of work accomplished at each institution now follow. In the plain text, emailed version of this
report, the Figures will be included as attachments (.jpg or .gif images),
while the web-page version, which should appear within the next few days, will
have the figures incorporated into the report itself. You should find 3 Figures attached to this email message, in
addition to the text itself.
Steve
Ledvina and Bill Abbett have worked on combining the PARAMESH adaptive mesh algorithm with the ZEUS 3D MHD code after attending our ``Paramesh''
mini-workshop with MacNeice and
Odstrcil at GSFC in July. They have
succeeded in getting the combined new
code (dubbed ``ZeusAMR'') to run, and are performing a series of test
simulations. This effort involved a
significant re-write of the underlying
ZEUS
code. The ZeusAMR code will eventually
be used for both large and small scale
coronal simulations. Abbett, Ledvina, Fisher, and MacNeice have submitted an
AGU abstract describing this work for the Fall 2001.
Yan Li
worked with Dick Canfield at Montana State University on the continuing
construction of the MURI case studies data access website. She has also started
to make the MDI magnetogram data sets to be linked to this table. These data
are also available as movies made to show the time evolution of the active
regions in the full-disk field context, see http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~yanli/mdicrmovs.html
. An abstract has been submitted to the Fall AGU meeting on the work described
in the previous monthly report, involving the response of global potential
field models to Bill Abbett's modeled emergence of active region fields.
Janet
Luhmann is examining the helmet streamer belt configuration at times of CMEs
and the location of the involved active region with respect to the helmet
streamer belt. This work relates to understanding both global coronal context
of CMEs and CME initiation in future global MHD models. An abstract on this has
also been submitted for the Fall AGU meeting.
George
Fisher and Neil Griffiths have mostly completed the Solar MURI web site, http://solarmuri.ssl.berkeley.edu
, and have set up a new server to host the web page, as well as to serve as a
centralized exchange for data and other information pertinent to the Solar MURI
project.
BBSO/NJIT
Contributions - Report received from Peter T. Gallagher
(1)
Coordinated Flare Observations: During August, we coordinated a week-long
campaign to search for impulsive chromospheric Doppler shifts associated with
large solar flares. Two simultaneously
clocked 50 Hz CCD cameras were set up on two orthogonal benches of the 65-cm
telescope at BBSO. Light from the telescope was directed to each bench by a
50:50 beamsplitter, and then to two H-alpha Lyot filters tunned to H-alpha line
center +/- 0.3 A. In conjunction with these data, high-sensitivity vector magnetograms
were simultaneously obtained using the Digital Vector Magnetograph (DVMG). We
are currently in the process of reducing and analysing the data.
(2) Max
Millennium Flare Catalogue: Software was completed to format the observing logs
from the Owen's Valley Solar Array
(OVSA) and the BBSO lead Global H-alpha
Network for the Max Millennium Flare Catalog.
(3)
Visible-Light Fabry-Perot: Control software is now being developed to
synchronize the Queensgate ET-50 Fabry-Perot with an SMD 1M60 camera. The
system will be moved to the dome for testing in October or November.
(4)
Publications: Wang et al. published a paper entitled "Inter-Active
Region Connection of Sympathetic
Flaring on 2000 February 17". The paper appeared in the 2001 October 1
issue of ApJ.
Drexel
University - Report received from Peter MacNeice.
We
continued development work on our existing CME
`breakout' model code, continued development work on a High Order
Godonov version, and interviewed candidates for a post-doctoral position in
support of this project.
Previously
we implemented a number of fixes to handle a numerical cavitation problem which
had appeared in high resolution runs of the ARC_FCT2.5D_AMR code. These fixes seem to be a source of
instability, which we have been attempting to characterize.
Mr. Jimin
Gao has been working to generate a more general initial field configuration for
the numerical model. Specifically, we have generated a multipole field which
will enable us to test the breakout model in 2.5D by applying shear away from
the equator.
Mr. Jimin
Gao has designed a test problem for the high order Godonov code under
development, using the Sedov-Taylor analytic solution for a large point
explosion in 3D.
We
conducted phone interviews with four candidates for a post-doctoral position
that will support this project.
Montana
State University - Report received from Dana W. Longcope.
To choose
appropriate case studies for the observational part of our project, it is
necessary to gather information -- which regions are well observed from the
point of view of modeling? For this
purpose, Canfield worked with Yan Li (UCB) to add Robert Leamon's extensive
list of eruptions from sigmoids to her Solar MURI event list. Although the two
lists have not yet been integrated, Yan Li has now put Leamon's list on the
web: http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~yanli/muri/sigmoid.table.html
.
Canfield
and MSU undergraduate Zachary Holder started a web page that documents the
availability of Hawaii vector magnetograms for events in Yan Li's event
list: http://solar.physics.montana.edu/muri/vec/
. Our next job is to identify vector
magnetograms that are relevant to events in Leamon's list and add them to this
web page.
Piet
Martens submitted an abstract and prepared a paper for the Yohkoh 10 meeting,
but its delivery has been postponed to January. He has been reading up on recent Big Bear papers on onset and
triggers of filament eruptions.
Dana
Longcope began work with Stephan Regnier, who will begin Post Doctoral research
under MURI funding in November. The two
set about comparing topologies found using full MHD extrapolation to those
found using Magnetic Charge Topology models.
Active region 8151 was selected since Regnier had previously performed
extrapolations of this region. The
comparisons will later be perfomed on regions selected from MURI event list.
The
following paper, which was reported as ``in press'' at the last bi-monthly
report, has now been published:
"Origin
and Evolution of Filament-Prominence Systems", P.C.H. Martens and C. Zwaan
2001, Astrophys. J., 558, 872-887
Stanford
Contributions - Report received from Yang Liu.
In the past
two months from August 1 to September 30, we have tested our method to generate
the Carrington synoptic maps using vector photospheric magnetic field in place
of the light-of-sight photospheric magnetic field, and developed our
extrapolation code so that this code can be used to calculate non-linear force
free field in heliospheric coordinate system.
To
generate vector magnetic field synoptic charts, we firstly calculate potential
field from synoptic charts. So, we obtain potential field in the photosphere.
Secondly,
we remap the photospheric vector magnetograms taken by the magnetographs.
Generally such observations are available in active regions. Finally, we
replace those remapped vector magnetograms to the potential field synoptic
chart. We use Gaussian function to smooth the vector magnetic field synoptic
chart in order to reduce the 'seam' effect (see attached figures).

Figure 7
- left panels -- the
potential field synoptic chart; right panels -- the vector magnetic field synoptic
chart.
The
extrapolation code based on Boundary Element Method has been developed to be
able to calculate non-linear force free field in the heliospheric coordinate
system. Thus the global non-linear force free field can be reproduced from the
vector magnetic field synoptic chart. We have calculated the potential field
using this code, and will compare it with other methods.

Figure 8
- top panel-- the vector
magnetic field synoptic chart; low panel-- the potential field synoptic chart
UCSD
Contributions - Report received from Bernard V. Jackson
During
these months of the MURI project Tamsen Dunn's work has allowed an accurate
incorporation of magnetic field into our time-dependent tomographic model. With the help of the UCSD MURI Co-Is and
Todd Hoeksema and Xuepu Zhao, Tamsen has successfully incorporated the Zhao and
Hoeksema (1995) magnetic field model into our solar wind analysis for eventual
use in real-time magnetic field forecasting.
Tamsen has also included the conversion of coordinates at Earth from our
model into GSM coordinates for comparison with ACE and other data sets. These
data comparisons are now underway, and will be presented at the fall AGU (Dunn
et al., 2001). With the help of other
students we have made these magnetic field data available for viewing in
three-dimensions and will also present these visualizations at the AGU (Hick et
al., 2001).
Further
MURI work was also continued on the incorporation of a 3D MHD model into our
computer code with the help of the group at
NOAA's Space Environment Center. A version of Tom Detman's 3D MHD code
to compiles and runs here on our UCSD computers. We have explored some aspects of the way to place this program
into our time-dependent tomography.
References:
Dunn, T,
B.V. Jackson, P.P. Hick and A. Buffington, 2001, "Introduction of the CSSS magnetic field model into the UCSD
tomographic solar wind model", to the fall 2001 AGU (submitted).
Hick,
P.P., B.V. Jackson, A. Buffington and M.J. Bailey, 2001, "Visualization of remotely-sensed
heliospheric plasmas", to the fall
2001 AGU (submitted).
Zhao, X,
and Hoeksema, J.T., "Prediction of the interplanetary magnetic field
strength", J. Geophys. Res, 100, 19, 1995.
We
continued incorporation of the Paramesh package into the 3-D interplanetary
solar wind code ENLIL. The hydrodynamic part of the code was successfully
tested on various test problems. An example (interaction of shocks, origin of
new contact discontinuity, and formation of a jet due to Rayleigh-Taylor
instability) can be seen as an animated gif at this URL: http://solarmuri.ssl.berkeley.edu/~odstrcil/public/images/r468.gif . We spent some time investigating various
criteria and conditions for refinement and derefinement of the numerical grid.
The magnetic part of the code has been modified as well and its verification is
in progress; together with development of IDL procedures for visualization of
the magnetic field on block-structured data.
Odstrcil
was invited to present a talk on "Numerical Simulations of Interplanetary
Disturbances" at the SOLSPA (Solar Cycle and Space Weather) conference in
Vico Equense, Italy, September 24-29, 2001.
University
of Hawaii - received from Jeff Kuhn.
We
continue to support the on-line vector magnetic field measurements obtained
from the IVM. An intermittent electronic steering-mirror servo gain problem was
identified and tentatively solved. A replacement servo control module for the
IVM mechanisms was identified and has been procured. The filter wheel required for rapid line selection (between
photospheric and chromospheric lines) has been fabricated.
The SOLARC
instrument declination drive and clutch assembly were fabricated and installed
in the telescope in order to improve its pointing stability.
The paper
"Persistent Coronal Streamers and Identification of Sunspot Clusters"
by Jing et al. has been accepted for publication in ApJ. This paper shows how
large scale coronal streamers can be sustained by the global field contribution
from long-lived sunspot clusters.
University
of New Hampshire - received from Terry Forbes.
Terry
Forbes has been working with Dave Webb on a comparison of CME observations from
SMM and SOHO with predictions of a previously published model by Lin and Forbes
(2000) for the growth of the current sheet which forms in the aftermath of a
CME. One of the key factors which
affects how the position of the lower and upper tips of the current sheet
evolve with time is the variation of the coronal density with height. This variation affects the rate of
reconnection in the sheet, and thus, the rate at which the current sheet is
eroded by reconnection.
After comparison
of the SMM observations with the published model it has become apparent that
the exponential density model previously used is not adequate. However, by replacing the exponential
density model with a much more realistic one published by Sittler and
Guhatahkurta (1999), we have now been able to obtain as reasonable agreement as
can be expected for the Lin and Forbes model which is not really valid at large
distances (> 3 Rsolar) away from the Sun.
Two
aspects of this work which may be of interest to other team members are: (1) the Sittler and Guhatahkurta model
provides a fairly realistic density model of the inner corona while at the same
time being relatively easy to implement in a theoretical analysis. (2)
Although the Lin and Forbes model provides the essential ingredients to
account for the onset and initial propagation of CMEs it is severely limited by
being a planar, two-dimensional model.
In its present form in can only provide qualitative results, but it has
the potential to serve as a guide to the behavior expected to occur in more
realistic, three-dimensional models.

Figure 9
- This
diagram shows the emergence from the Sun of a CME/flux-rope (blue shaded
region) which drives a shock (thick red arc) into the ambient solar wind. Ions (dots) are accelerated by the process
of diffusive shock acceleration and excite hydromagnetic waves in front of the
shock (denoted by wiggles in the spiral magnetic field). The excited waves, which greatly enhance the
rate of ion acceleration, are transmitted through the shock and trap
accelerated ions downstream where they are cooled in the expanding solar
wind. At the outer extent of the
excited-wave sheath some precursor ions escape the shock by magnetic focusing
and propagate nearly scatter-free to Earth orbit (denoted by a schematic Earth
with bow shock).
References:
Lin, J.,
and T. G. Forbes, Effects of reconnection on the coronal mass
ejection
process, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 2375-2392, (2000).
Sittler,
E. C. J., and M. Guhathakurta, Semiempirical two-dimensional
magnetohydrodynamics
model of the solar corona and interplanetary medium,
Astrophys.
J., 523, 812-826, (1999).
Work Performed From October
1 2001 – December 31 2001
Progress
toward our MURI goals is described in detail in the sections as organized by sub-award institution. During the next 10 weeks, George Fisher and
Dana Longcope (member of the Solar MURI team) will be at the Institute for
Theoretical Physics in Santa Barbara, participating as ``program coordinators''
for a special program on Solar Magnetic Fields. Many other members of our team will also be participating in this
program, and our next quarterly report will describe research done at the ITP
that is supportive of our project.
UC
Berkeley Report (assembled by George
Fisher)
Fisher
organized the December 9 2001 MURI team meeting which was held at
the Space
Sciences Lab. The focus of that meeting
was the organization of several "mini-workshops" over the coming
year. The minutes of the meeting will
be posted on the "solarmuri" website separately. Briefly, the mini-workshops will address
these topics: (1) Well defined numerical experiments exploring CME eruption
mechanisms (hosted by Terry Forbes at UNH from May 14-16), (2) How to use vector
magnetogram observing sequences to drive MHD codes (hosted by George Fisher at
UCB around the 1st week of May), and (3) a workshop on contructing global
magnetic maps of the Sun, to be held in Boulder on April 15. Bernie Jackson is organizing this workshop.
Abbett and
Ledvina demonstrated the new code ZeusAMR, a merge between PARAMESH and Zeus3D,
at the Fall AGU by performing simulations of magnetic flux emergence into the
low corona. The 3D MHD code ANMHD was
used to drive the photospheric boundary with the top of a rising, moderately
twisted Omega loop, and ZeusAMR was able to refine the mesh where the bipole
emerged through the photosphere and corona, allowing the simulation box to span
a large portion of the low corona while simultaneously resolving the region of
interest.
Ledvina
has continued work with the non-AMR version of ZEUS-3D in spherical
coordinates. The current challenges in
that area are the proper description of the inner boundary conditions, and the
need for implementation of the Boris correction scheme in order to reduce the
time step size.
This
spring, Ledvina will take the lead role in developing a spherical version of
ZEUS-AMR that will be applied to the global corona.
Yan Li has
made major progress working with Dick Canfield on the MURI case studies data
collection and website. The event list is becoming quite large since different
groups are studying different types of phenomena (e.g., the Montana focus on
sigmoids, her own focus on CMEs). The progress on this can be seen at the
website
http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~yanli/muri/events.html
. Yan Li also presented a poster at the Fall AGU meeting showing the response
of global potential field models, based on a large-scale photospheric dipole
field, to Bill Abbett's model of emerging active region fields. The poster
included a first attempt to model the same event in a time-dependent global MHD
simulation, carried out by Jon Linker at SAIC, who collaborates with us through
a related NSF Space Weather project. The work shows the evolution of coronal
hole extensions in response to the active region emergence, similar to the
"Whole Sun Month" study period scenario. The helmet streamer above
the active region has the appearance of splitting when it is on the limb, as is
sometimes observed in coronagraph images. No major transient loop eruption was
produced in this preliminary study using the MHD model, but the emergence was
slow enough to allow almost quasistatic adjustment of the corona, and there was
no twist in the emerging active region fields or shear in the initial helmet
streamer belt. Future work along these lines is planned to consider the impact
of all of these factors.
Janet
Luhmann presented a Fall AGU poster focused on examining the relative locations
of helmet streamer belt and the involved active regions at times of CMEs. In
the low solar activity cases examined, the involved active regions were often
located in closed field regions outside of the main helmet streamer belt
determined from potential field source surface models. Occasionally, the active
regions lay beneath the helmet streamer belt. The interplanetary consequences
for these scenarios seem to differ, with the former producing ICMEs in low speed
wind at ACE and the latter producing ICMEs on the leading edge of high speed
streams. However, tooo few cases have been examine thus far to conclude that
this occurs as a rule. It also appears that the active region fields become
engaged in the helmet streamer belt following eruptions in the cases where they
are initially isolated. However, this interpretation is greatly limited by the
use of potential field models to describe the active region fields. Work along
these lines will continue in an effort to help define realistic CME simulation
scenarios.
We have
made an offer of a postdoctoral appointment to Brian Welsch, who is completing
his PhD in Physics at Montana State University under Prof. Dana Longcope. Welsch plans to join our group in February or
March, and will work on projects in collaboration with MURI team members and
with our solar colleagues at the Naval Research Laboratory.
BBSO
Report (sent by Yong-Jae Moon)
(1)
Visible-Light Fabry-Perot for Imaging Vector Magnetograph: After successful
testing a Queensgate ET-50 Fabry-Perot in our laboratory, we are preparing for
testing it on our 65 cm telescope. We expect camera control software to be
ready soon.
(2) Global
H-alpha Network: Now we are providing recent solar flare movies and daily full
disk movies from global H-alpha network (http://www.bbso.njit.edu/
Research/Halpha/). Their observing logs and charts are also available.
(3) Field
orientation in the interplanetary flux ropes and filaments: Using ACE
measurements of the interplanetary magnetic fields, we define the orientation
of magnetic flux ropes in magnetic clouds and compare them to the orientation
of the solar magnetic fields and disappearing filaments. We have found that the direction of the
axial field in the flux ropes and their helicity are consistent with the
direction of the axial field and helicity of the erupted filaments. Thus, the
geoeffectiveness of a CME is defined by the orientation and structure of the
erupted filament, and by its magnetic helicity, as well. We now use this
technique to forecast geoeffectiveness of CMEs using full disk H-alpha images
from the Global H-alpha Network, full disk SOHO/MDI and high resolution BBSO
DMG magnetograms (Yurchyshyn al., ApJ, in press).
(4)
Magnetic field changes associated with a X20 flare: Big Bear Solar Observatory
observed the X20 flare that occurred at approximately 21:50 UT on 2001 April 2
with its standard complement of instruments. We have studied the evolution of
high resolution and high cadence longitudinal magnetograph observations in the
region of the flare. The data reveal that there was a significant increase in
the magnetic field on the limbward side of the neutral line of the active
region at the location of the flare, while the magnetic field on the side of
the neutral line closer to the disk center remained constant (Spirock et al.
submitted to ApJ).
(5)
Relationship between magnetic helicity and flaring flux: Using a set of 6.5
hour 1 minute cadence MDI magnetograms of NOAA 8100, we have obtained the
magnetic helicity transport rate via photospheric footpoint shuffling motions. As a result, we have found a very
close correlation between the integrated X-ray fluxes of homologous flares and
the corresponding magnetic helicity accumulated during the flaring time interval. We also note an abrupt increase of photospheric
shuffling motion around the flaring
time of M4.1 flare. (Moon et al. in
preparation)
(6)
Statistical evidence of sympathetic flares We collected 48 sets of sympathetic flare candidates, a pair of
consecutive flares in which the second flare starts before the first one ends.
To separate highly probable sympathetic flares from them, we estimated the
ratio of actual flaring overlap time divided by random- coincidence time. We have found a noticeable overabundance at
short time intervals in the waiting time distribution of highly probable data,
implying that sympathetic flares really exist.
It is also noted that transequatorial loops are more intimately
associated with them than longitudinal loops are. (Moon et al. in preparation)
(7)
Publications:
Yurchyshyn
al.'s paper entitled with
"Orientation of magnetic field in the interplanetary flux ropes and solar
filaments" is accepted for the publication in the ApJ.
Moon et
al's paper entitled with
"Force-freeness of solar magnetic
fields in the photosphere" is accepted for the publication in the ApJ.
Moon et
al's paper entitled with "Flaring
time interval distribution and spatial correlation of major X-ray solar
flares" is published in the A12, 2001 issue of
JGR-space physics.
In
summary, we continued development work on our existing CME `breakout' model code, continued development
work on a High Order Godonov version, and
we filled a post-doctoral position.
We have
implemented a revision of the Boris correction, in combination with a Lorentz
factor, in an attempt to control spurious velocities associated with the
cavitation phenomenon. We are currently testing this design.
We have
begun building support for non-cartesian coordinates into the development
version of Paramesh, in preparation for its use with the high order Godonov
code under development.
We made an offer of a post-doctoral research position to Mr. Andrew Phillips from the University of Manchester, UK, contingent upon his successful completion of his PhD, which he has accept