From chae@cnu.ac.kr Tue May 27 17:52:35 2003
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 09:51:16 +0900
From: Jongchul Chae <chae@cnu.ac.kr>
To: Pascal Demoulin <Pascal.Demoulin@obspm.fr>
Cc: Kanya Kusano <kusano@hiroshima-u.ac.jp>,
    'mitch Berger' <m.berger@ucl.ac.uk>,
    'Pablo Mininni' <mininni@df.uba.ar>,
    'Richard Canfield' <canfield@mithra.physics.montana.edu>,
    'Alexander Nindos' <anindos@cc.uoi.gr>, 'BC Low' <low@hao.ucar.edu>,
    'Jim Klimchuk' <james.klimchuk@nrl.navy.mil>,
    'Marcelo Lopez-Fuentes' <lopezf@nrl.navy.mil>,
    'Sarah Gibson' <sgibson@hao.ucar.edu>, sakurai@solar.mtk.nao.ac.jp,
    'Terry Forbes' <terry.forbes@unh.edu>,
    "'Brian T. Welsch'" <welsch@ssl.berkeley.edu>,
    dana@mithra.physics.montana.edu, magara@mithra.physics.montana.edu,
    apevtsov@nso.edu, haimin@sundog.caltech.edu, yjmoon@bbso.njit.edu,
    "[EUC-KR] ?ߣ äçÙ¥" <yokoyama.t@eps.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: 2 new papers on magnetic helicity

    [The following text is in the "euc-kr" character set]
    [Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set]
    [Some characters may be displayed incorrectly]


Dear Pascal,

I fully support your argument. You are the one who first clarified the
relation between the flux density patten transport velocity and the
plasma velocity. Attached is my own note supporting your finding, where
I tried to make clear the definition of flux density pattern transport
velocity. Based on your result, I will not attempt to measure the
horizontal fields and Doppler velocity for the derivation of the
"emergence term" in the helicity flux.

You have done a good job. Congratullations!

Best wishes,

Jongchul



  [Part 2, Application/POSTSCRIPT  124KB]
  [Unable to print this part]